Leading UX strategy to launch Swedbank's first digital savings advisory experience

Swedbank needed to bring legally compliant financial advisory into digital channels to scale advisory services and meet changing customer expectations. I led UX design for the first advisory MVPs, solving a critical 95% drop-off on the first screen while navigating regulatory requirements, design system constraints, and cross-functional stakeholder alignment.

Challenge

Swedbank wanted to offer customer-centric, legally compliant financial advisory in digital channels, but advisory had traditionally been handled offline. Early MVPs revealed a critical challenge: a ~95% drop-off on the very first screen of the advisory flow. Users struggled to understand the purpose, value, and effort required before even starting the advisory. Strict legal requirements and an existing design system limited how much the experience could be simplified, while still demanding high trust and cognitive effort upfront.

Swedbank wanted to offer customer-centric, legally compliant financial advisory in digital channels, but advisory had traditionally been handled offline. Early MVPs revealed a critical challenge: a ~95% drop-off on the very first screen of the advisory flow. Users struggled to understand the purpose, value, and effort required before even starting the advisory. Strict legal requirements and an existing design system limited how much the experience could be simplified, while still demanding high trust and cognitive effort upfront.

Approach

I approached the challenge by focusing on how the advisory was introduced and explained to users, rather than only optimizing individual steps. Early research showed that users dropped off before understanding the purpose, value, or effort required to complete the flow. I first worked within existing regulatory and design system constraints, using analytics, interviews, and usability testing to make incremental improvements. When these changes reached their limits, I initiated a collaboration with UX, UX copy, legal, and the design system team to explore a new design concept. The concept focused on clearer framing, reduced cognitive load, and a more human, approachable tone - while remaining compliant.

I approached the challenge by focusing on how the advisory was introduced and explained to users, rather than only optimizing individual steps. Early research showed that users dropped off before understanding the purpose, value, or effort required to complete the flow. I first worked within existing regulatory and design system constraints, using analytics, interviews, and usability testing to make incremental improvements. When these changes reached their limits, I initiated a collaboration with UX, UX copy, legal, and the design system team to explore a new design concept. The concept focused on clearer framing, reduced cognitive load, and a more human, approachable tone - while remaining compliant.

Key tentions

-  Legal correctness vs. approachability - Design system consistency vs. meaningful UX change - Incremental improvements vs. conceptual reframing

-  Legal correctness vs. approachability - Design system consistency vs. meaningful UX change - Incremental improvements vs. conceptual reframing

Design focus

- Clarify purpose and expectations early - Respect constraints without being constrained by them - Design for user stamina, not just completion

- Clarify purpose and expectations early - Respect constraints without being constrained by them - Design for user stamina, not just completion

I approached the challenge by focusing on how the advisory was introduced and explained to users, rather than only optimizing individual steps. Early research showed that users dropped off before understanding the purpose, value, or effort required to complete the flow. I first worked within existing regulatory and design system constraints, using analytics, interviews, and usability testing to make incremental improvements. When these changes reached their limits, I initiated a collaboration with UX, UX copy, legal, and the design system team to explore a new design concept. The concept focused on clearer framing, reduced cognitive load, and a more human, approachable tone - while remaining compliant.

Approach

Result

Usability testing of the conceptual design showed a major improvement: 9 out of 10 users were able to pass the first screen, compared to near-total drop-off in earlier versions. The concept demonstrated how compliant advisory could be both understandable and inviting, and was presented to key stakeholders as a foundation for future digital advisory work.

Usability testing of the conceptual design showed a major improvement: 9 out of 10 users were able to pass the first screen, compared to near-total drop-off in earlier versions. The concept demonstrated how compliant advisory could be both understandable and inviting, and was presented to key stakeholders as a foundation for future digital advisory work.

Usability testing of the conceptual design showed a major improvement: 9 out of 10 users were able to pass the first screen, compared to near-total drop-off in earlier versions. The concept demonstrated how compliant advisory could be both understandable and inviting, and was presented to key stakeholders as a foundation for future digital advisory work.

Result

Black and white portrait of a man with a beard and glasses

Amanda Widegren

Systems thinker. Interface maker. Creative technologist.

Located in Stockholm, always available in cyberspace.

© Copyright 2026. All rights Reserved.

Black and white portrait of a man with a beard and glasses

Amanda Widegren

Systems thinker. Interface maker. Creative technologist.

Located in Stockholm, always available in cyberspace.

© Copyright 2026. All rights Reserved.